A Step-by-step Guide to Constructing a Perceptual Map

How to construct a perceptual map

The section below highlights how you can construct a perceptual (or a positioning map). However, if you are new to perceptual maps, you may need to review what is a perceptual map first.

If you would like to download a free Excel spreadsheet that will enable you to quickly and easily create your own perceptual maps, then visit www.perceptualmaps.com

Step one – select two determinant attributes

There are two main approaches to constructing a perceptual map. The first is used it is where management of the organization utilizes their collective the knowledge and experience of the market to construct a perceptual map, and the second approach is where you have access to the results of a suitable  market research study.

Either way, the first step is to select the determinant attributes. As discussed in the what is a perceptual map topic, determinant attribute are those attributes that the consumer relies upon in their purchase decision. In other words, determinant attributes are quite important to them and the consumer uses them to help differentiate competitive offerings.

As a rough guide, some likely determinant attributes in different product categories are shown in the following table:

Product Category Likely Determinant Attributes
Shoes Comfort, design/style, quality, functionality
Instant coffee Flavor/taste, country of origin, variety, quality
Breakfast cereal Healthiness, sugar level, variety, fun/boring factor
Holiday destination Temperature, travel distance, culture difference, facilities
Camera Zoom, memory, size/weight, picture quality

 

Note: Price is not shown in the above table. While price is a cue for quality and certainly does affect the perceptions of a brand/product, it is generally not helpful when constructing a perceptual map. You may use quality instead of price – but never use price and quality in the same map as they are high correlated and the map’s outcome will be poor.

 

Depending upon the product category, we need to consider how consumers choose the product between offerings. Take the shoe category; most consumers would select shoes on the attributes listed in the above table. While that list may not be valid for every single consumer, we are simply trying to get an understanding of the target market overall, so some generalization is fine.

From the list of possible determinant attributes (that may be given to you or you may need to develop based on your best judgment), you need to select two only. These two will form the axes of your perceptual map. Try and pick the two that you think would be the most important in terms of the product choice between competitive offerings.

 

Step two – list the main competitors in the product category

For whatever product category you are looking at, you will need to compile a list of the main competitive brands/products. These are the brands that will be plotted upon on to your perceptual map. You don’t need to list every single competitor in the marketplace, but you should try for a list of five to ten players.

Note that the term ‘brands/products’ has been used. This is because sometimes there are multiple products under the same brand. For example in the cereal market, Kellogg’s is the main family brand name, and they run a number of individual brand names will such as Kellogg’s Corn Flakes, and they also may have product line extensions (that is, different varieties of Corn Flakes). So depending upon the task, you may need to drill down deeper if required.

 

Step three – Create scores for these brands

Now we have our have chosen the brands, we need to allocate scores for them using the two determinant attributes. The simplest way to do this is by using simple 1 to 5 rating scale.

Let’s look at an example in the following table. This example uses the holiday with two of the determinant attributes listed category (from the above table). Note how a 1 to 5 polarized (opposite) scale has been used. The scores are a good estimate of how an average American traveler (the assumed target market in this case) would perceive these possible holiday destinations/countries.

Holidays

Travel distance

1 = very close, 5 = very far

Culture difference

1 = very similar, 5 = quite different

Mexico

1

3

Canada

1

1

The UK

3

1

India

4

4

Singapore

4

2

Australia

5

1

Egypt

3

5

Brazil

2

3

China

3

5


 

Note: Obviously, if you have been given the relevant data or access to a market research study, then you don’t have to estimate the figures in the above table; you can use the real data instead.